Digital Learning at Grant Wood AEA
  • Home
  • Learn
    • Summer Summit
    • ITEC 2019
    • Iowa 1 to 1
    • Green Screen
    • Stop Motion
    • Physical Computing
    • Free Media
    • AR/VR in Schools
  • Think
    • Blog
    • BrightBytes
    • Tech Coaches
    • Blended Learning
    • Think Make Innovate
    • Edtech Take Out
  • Grow
    • Pear Deck Resources
    • Makerspaces
    • Google Expeditions
    • GWAEA Online Resources
    • OER
    • Computer Science
  • COVID19
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Learn
    • Summer Summit
    • ITEC 2019
    • Iowa 1 to 1
    • Green Screen
    • Stop Motion
    • Physical Computing
    • Free Media
    • AR/VR in Schools
  • Think
    • Blog
    • BrightBytes
    • Tech Coaches
    • Blended Learning
    • Think Make Innovate
    • Edtech Take Out
  • Grow
    • Pear Deck Resources
    • Makerspaces
    • Google Expeditions
    • GWAEA Online Resources
    • OER
    • Computer Science
  • COVID19
  • Contact

Ready to Launch? Beebot Curriculum Written By Engineering Students

10/21/2019

0 Comments

 
At ITEC 2018, I had the lucky opportunity to meet ITEC student volunteer and Iowa State student, Dagney Paskach, when she crashed our Makey Makey session, because she just wanted learn more.

Through our conversation, she shared with me that she was part of a team that wrote curriculum connecting Beebots and the NASA missions.  She asked, "Would I be interested in learning more?"  Um...YES!! 

So, please read on to learn more about how how this group of engineering students wrote Creative Commons licensed curriculum for elementary students that you can use with your students to fuel excitement around space missions.
Enjoy!
​~Amber Bridge


Cardinal Space Mining Club (CSM) is a student organization at Iowa State University dedicated to designing, building, and testing a robot to dig regolith, simulated Lunar soil as part of the NASA Robotic Mining Competition. As part of the competition, teams are also tasked with doing educational outreach within their communities. We love getting kids excited about STEM because we know that the younger kids get interested in STEM, the more likely they are to pursue it as a career. Two years ago, CSM had the pleasure of partnering with the first-grade teaching team at Ocotillo Elementary School in Phoenix, Arizona, to design curriculum for a week-long space robotics unit for the class of 93 first-grade students.

Our advisor’s niece was one of the first grade teachers at Ocotillo Elementary School. She reached out to us and asked us to help her think of the best way to teach her students how to code, so we initially started thinking about which robotics sets would be a good match. Bee-Bots are a great tool for teaching coding to first-graders who have never programmed before: the robots are programmed by pressing the buttons directly on the robot, so the students can see an obvious connection between the time when they give the robot instructions and they see the robot carry them out; there are no words, so reading level is not a barrier to entry as it is in most block-based coding tools; and they are fun to play with!

For us, providing context is a key component when working with students. Bee-Bots come with a plain white mat. This is nice, but we wanted to build a story for the Ocotillo students that they would get excited about, so they would feel intrinsically motivated to learn how to code. We realized we needed to expand from just designing one lesson to planning an entire week of curriculum. With “Mission: Martian Base, An Adventure in Space, Robotics, and Coding with Bee-Bots” we immersed the students in NASA robotics.
The last lesson in the unit was the mission. We designed and printed our own custom double-sided Bee-Bot mat, and mapped out six challenges the students needed to complete to build their Martian Base. The first two missions are on the first side of the mat, which has a map of a launch site on Earth. On the other side of the mat, there is a picture of the surface of Mars. To provide additional context, we decided to make the Bee-Bots look like rovers instead of bees. We designed and 3D printed covers for the Bee-Bots using a MakerBot 3D printer.

CSM adapted “Mission: Martian Base” to Iowa standards in 2019, and the unit is licensed under the Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 4.0 License.  For Grant Wood AEA schools, you can access the curriculum through the Grant Wood AEA Media Center.  Click on the Supplemental Lesson Button when you search for "Bee-Bot." If you don't have Bee-Bot, from here you can check out Bee-Bots for your school.  You can also reach out to your digital learning representative as we have the mats & 3D files already printed.

To support NASA’s initiative to promote the Artemis missions, we are currently designing new custom mats and challenges for the Bee-Bots to show kids they are the Artemis generation. Students will program their Bee-Bots to drive to designated locations on the mat where they will discover new things about the moon. This new curriculum will also eventually be available for public use as well.

The key takeaway is that Bee-Bots and other educational robotics tools have so much potential beyond what comes in the box. Through our outreach, we have found that students are most excited when we can tell a story and connect their learning to concrete, real-world applications using the content we want to teach, and then find the best technology (if necessary) to support that content learning.

Dagney Paskach, Cardinal Space Mining Outreach Co-Coordinator
@ISUSpaceMining

0 Comments

Edtech Conference Sessions: What Do We Want vs. What Do We Need?

10/17/2019

0 Comments

 
Picture
I recently returned from the ITEC Fall Conference in Des Moines. I was lucky enough to be able to present, and attend a number of great learning opportunities. The keynote speakers, Jenny Magiera and Joe Sanfelippo, were inspiring and energizing. Overall, it was a fantastic couple of days. However, it made me reflect on the types of sessions that I have seen at edtech conferences all over the country, and how they have evolved over the last few years. This blog post is a summary of that reflection.

When I first started going to conferences, there were a lot of tool based sessions. They were designed to give you as many options as you could possibly want in one sitting. These kind of sessions reached their height with the somewhat infamous 60 apps in 60 minutes format. iPad apps, Chrome extensions, web 2.0 sites, AT apps, and more would seemingly lend themselves very well to this kind of information style presentation.

However, in recent years, there has been some pushback against this format. The criticism being that we don’t need more tools, we need better pedagogy. We, as educators, need to spend more time on a more considered approach to technology integration in order to ensure that it has the right impact on teaching and learning. After all, the tool is just a tool. The state standards and the learning outcomes for your students are more important. The app, the extension, or the website you use, is just a vehicle to help you get there.

Of course, it is hard to argue with that notion. Technology has to be used purposefully in our classrooms, and we need to be sure we are using it for the right reasons. We won’t improve as educators if we don’t have opportunities to learn about best practice and what that looks like. There are frameworks that can help us with that, (SAMR, TPACK, T3, Four Shifts, etc.), and although we might not all rally behind the same one, I would bet that you could find at least one that fits the way that you like to teach. Good edtech conferences will have sessions like this for those that need it.

Is there a third path? A way to talk about new tools and new ideas for how to use them. Personally, I see more and more sessions that combine these two approaches. Sometimes it is a deep dive into one tool like Flipgrid or SeeSaw. The presenter shows how they work as well as how they can be used intentionally to support learning outcomes for students. Other times it might be tech tools that revolve around a theme or a particular teaching strategy.

At different times in my career, I have given presentations in all of these formats. Which one is best? That’s not really the purpose of this post, but what I will say is that different people have different needs. Beginning teachers who have less experience in the classroom are going to want to find some new tools for their toolbox, but unless the college they went to was a big proponent of technology in schools, they are probably going to need those best practice sessions first. However, experienced instructional coaches, the model teachers, the TOSAs and the tech savvy trailblazers who know what good instruction with technology looks like, well, they are looking for new tools that they can use to maximize engagement and give students new opportunities.

At the end of the day, I think that there will always be a thirst for what’s new in edtech. Free apps or services that teachers use, and love, do have a habit of going out of business, or they end up introducing paid plans that limit the features that were previously free. I’m not saying we should return to the days of 60 apps in 60 minutes, nor am I saying that the preferred format for an edtech session has to be a deep dive into teaching frameworks, but, if done well, a compromise is not always a bad thing.

As attendees, the onus is on us to make good choices. We are professionals in one of the best professions that there is. If we want to be better at what we do and create the best possible experiences for our students, we need to look at our practice and think about what you need as an educator. Be honest with yourself. If you attend a session and it isn't going in the direction that you thought it might, there is nothing wrong with getting up and walking out to find another that would better suit your needs. I will often pick two or three sessions in one time slot for that very reason. Good presenters know that this is not a slight against their content. It's just not the content that you need right now.

As presenters, we have a duty and a responsibility to ensure that we are trying to meet the needs of as many people in our audience as possible. This can be a fine line to walk, but it’s an important one. These people are giving up their time to learn from you, so give them the best experience you can and model what you would like to see in their classroom. Technology can’t be separate from pedagogy. We want students using technology as part of an integrated learning experience that is part of a rich and varied curriculum, but some people are going to need help getting there. That’s our job as presenters and facilitators of learning. Some days we do this better than others, but if we hold on to this as our guiding light, and we make ourselves accountable to this philosophy, we have a chance of making a real difference in schools.

I’d love to hear more about the types of sessions that you like to attend at edtech conferences or any thoughts that you have on conferences that you have been to. Are they meeting your needs? Do they give you the inspiration that you need to make learning better in your classroom? Send me a tweet or leave a comment below.

Jonathan Wylie (@jonathanwylie)
Digital Learning Consultant, Grant Wood AEA
0 Comments

    Connect



    Blog Feed

    RSS Feed


    Like Us on Facebook

    Digital Learning at Grant Wood Area Education Agency

    Promote Your Page Too

    Our YouTube Show

    Picture

    Our Podcast

    Picture

    Our Tweets!

    Tweets by @DLGWAEA

    Authors

    Stacy Behmer
    Jonathan Wylie
    Gina Rogers
    Amber Bridge
    Beth Swantz

    Mindy Cairney
    Lynn Kleinmeyer
    Corey Rogers


    Archives

    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    May 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014


    Categories

    All
    3d Printing
    4Cs
    Assessment
    Augmented Reality
    Best Of The Web
    Blogging
    Board Games
    Coding
    Collaboration
    Communication
    Computer Science
    Connected Classrooms
    Creativity
    Device Deployment
    Digital Citizenship
    Digital Classrooms
    Elementary
    Flipped Classroom
    Formative Assessment
    GAFE
    Google
    Google Apps EDU
    Google Expeditions
    Green Screen
    Hattie
    Innovate
    Ipad
    ISTE
    Literacy
    Make
    Makerspace
    Office 365
    Pear Deck
    Personalized Learning
    PLN
    Podcast
    Professional Learning
    Research
    Service Learning
    Student Choice
    Think
    ThinkMakeInnovate
    Update
    Video
    Virual Reality
    Wakelet
    Web 2.0
    Youtube

Grant Wood Area Education Agency extends equal opportunities in its employment practices, educational programs and services, and does not discriminate on the basis of color, gender, race, national origin, religion, creed, age, sexual orientation, gender identity, marital status, disability, veteran status or as otherwise prohibited by law. If you believe you or your child has been discriminated against or treated unjustly, please contact the Agency’s Equity Coordinator, Maria Cashman, at 319-399-6847 or 800-332-8488. Grant Wood AEA, 4401 Sixth St SW, Cedar Rapids, IA 52404.

It is the goal of Grant Wood Area Education Agency that the information on our website be accessible to individuals with visual, hearing or cognitive disabilities. Good faith efforts have been made to ensure that our site complies with the world wide web consortium’s web content accessibility guidelines. Learn more here.